{"id":37,"date":"2011-10-02T22:15:34","date_gmt":"2011-10-03T03:15:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/?p=37"},"modified":"2012-11-09T19:55:25","modified_gmt":"2012-11-10T01:55:25","slug":"sttng-s01e0102-encounter-at-farpoint","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/2011\/10\/02\/sttng-s01e0102-encounter-at-farpoint\/","title":{"rendered":"ST:TNG S01E01&#038;02: Encounter at Farpoint"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the summer Susie and I decided\u2014perhaps over a beer or two [I do not recall]\u2014, as we were (are!) both Trekkies of sorts, to work our way through seven seasons of &#8216;The Next Generation.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>We went boldly.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>First we had to work our way through several other series and movies. As it was, we&#8217;d watched four seasons of &#8216;Mad Men&#8217; and are looking forward to the fifth. Ah, 2012 &#8230; We contemplated &#8217;30 Rock&#8217; (Susie was already a fan) but held off. I convinced her to watch &#8216;Firefly&#8217; (and &#8216;Serenity&#8217;); in exchange her mother agreed to watch the 2009 &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; reboot. And before that we had watched all the &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; movies, from &#8216;The Motion Picture&#8217; all the way to the reboot. Then as we were preparing to move early-mid July we started a few episodes of &#8216;House,&#8217; all of which I&#8217;d seen, in order to pass the time; once we got to Tuscaloosa it became a &#8216;project&#8217;, and we&#8217;re up to mid-season 7. 8 begins this week on TV. And then there was &#8216;Doctor Who&#8217; (new series), which was a bit of a dare-chore-punishment (or: a promise to watch two episodes, <em>but that&#8217;s it!<\/em> she said), but, after one Eccleston episode and one Smith, it became a project that we just finished Saturday with &#8216;The Wedding of River Song.&#8217; And let&#8217;s not even mention &#8216;Torchwood&#8217; &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><em>Whew &#8230;!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>So with &#8216;Doctor Who&#8217; done for now, &#8216;Torchwood&#8217; advanced to &#8216;Miracle Day&#8217;, and the other projects likewise completed on pause until new seasons begin,\u00a0 it was time to start &#8216;The Next Generation&#8217; &#8230; and both of us realized what a chore the first two seasons <em>might<\/em> be. Well, I say might. Well, more like will probably be. Well, I think I mean will certainly be. The A.V. Club began such a project a while back. And Daniel did something similar (is he on season 7 yet? I think so). Full reviews are therefore unnecessary. What we&#8217;re doing is not novel, but it&#8217;s an exercise in both nostalgia, shared memory, and sharing that&#8217;s kind of intriguing.<\/p>\n<p><em>Bring on the Space Irish!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>But not yet: first, &#8216;Encounter at Farpoint.&#8217; I&#8217;d forgotten how long it takes to meet Riker. I&#8217;d forgotten Troi&#8217;s <em>terrible<\/em> mini-skirt\/dress with boots that seemed more like a reject from the 60s series than an homage to it. How young Data looks (and Troi). I expected Riker&#8217;s lack of facial hair, but Picard still has some hair, and, as expected, all the costumes seem too &#8230; insubstantial.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s great entertainment to watch Patrick Stewart Shakespearing it up (yes, that&#8217;s a verb). The Battle Bridge is a throw-back to the old series, and I&#8217;d forgotten that. Expecially during Q&#8217;s kangaroo court we noticed 1) how shoddy the production values were in a way (looking particularly dated) but also 2) how much this episode (if not the series as a whole) was trying to be <em>film on television<\/em>. Just look at those cameral angles!<\/p>\n<p>And Q &#8230; ah, Q. First: during the trial John de Lancie in his &#8216;judge&#8217; outfit, face all wrapped up, looks like the slightly-older, mostly-male version of Eva Greene (by way of, oh, &#8216;Casino Royale,&#8217; let&#8217;s say). Doubt me? Look it up. Secondly: no one seems to be having more fun on set than de Lancie, though Stewart&#8217;s ernestness comes in a close second. Frakes hits his marks, and there are scenes where it seems apparant that that&#8217;s exactly what he&#8217;s doing &#8230; mechanically nailing this, that, and these &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Earlier another friend and I were discussing an article\/essay I&#8217;d not read (and still haven&#8217;t) comparing\/contrasting the Roddenberry and Abrams aesthetics. Good Kantian that I am I suggested that Roddenberry is better described as providing an &#8216;ethics&#8217;; she suggested, perhaps, &#8216;ideology&#8217; (as it&#8217;s more encompassing). I first admitted that Abrams\u2014considering the &#8216;style&#8217; of his reboot\u2014had an &#8216;aesthetics&#8217;, but I then modified my position to claiming, instead, that against Roddenberry&#8217;s &#8216;ethics&#8217; that Abrams (across his television creations, where Roddenberry and Abrams are shorthand for the creators gravitating toward and orbiting around them) provides more a &#8216;metaphysics,&#8217; both an ontology and an epistemology. That is, his shows provide both a 1) way the world is\/works and 2) a manner of knowing and experiencing said mystery-infused phenomena. In Abrams&#8217; &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; as elsewhere, &#8216;what to do&#8217; is based on knowledge and how best to achieve specific goals; Roddenberry&#8217;s creations act within the limits of an ethos that has both promises (a kind of optimistic humanism) and consequences. &#8216;Style&#8217; for both is less a matter of considered aesthetics\u2014think of those lens flares, those hollow-looking &#8216;rocks&#8217;\u2014, I think, and more an adoption of the standards and technology of their respective eras.<\/p>\n<p>That is, nothing to see here &#8230; move along.<\/p>\n<p>And to make a long story short (<em>too late!<\/em>), &#8216;Encounter at Farpoint&#8217; provides a big dose of that Roddenberry ethos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the summer Susie and I decided\u2014perhaps over a beer or two [I do not recall]\u2014, as we were (are!) both Trekkies of sorts, to work our way through seven seasons of &#8216;The Next Generation.&#8217; We went boldly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[17,18,590],"class_list":["post-37","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-star-trek","tag-kant","tag-q","tag-star-trek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}