{"id":751,"date":"2013-03-23T22:56:10","date_gmt":"2013-03-24T03:56:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/?p=751"},"modified":"2013-03-29T13:31:42","modified_gmt":"2013-03-29T18:31:42","slug":"2013-03-23-march-madness-indeed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/2013\/03\/23\/2013-03-23-march-madness-indeed\/","title":{"rendered":"2013.03.23: March Madness &#8230; indeed!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>And it rained today. And rained and rained. We got in some quality tv-together-time (T3).<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>1. &#8216;Millennium&#8217; &#8230; Frank Black accompanies Peter Watts on a not-quite-sanctioned trip to Germany to find the long-lost hand of St. Sebastian. It&#8217;s as if &#8216;Millennium&#8217; took over &#8216;Relic Hunter&#8217; for an episode. It&#8217;s sort of a &#8216;mythology&#8217; episode for the series, and C C H Pounder was back (cue ominous music). Season two is really playing up the religious angle to the group, and as the reviews at the A.V. Club have pointed out, it&#8217;s occasionally a kind of &#8216;genius insane&#8217; (or insane genius). Here we flesh out the group by showing levels of authority above Peter Watts, by showing how it has international scope, how it has a very long history, and how it has enemies without that know about it and tempt those within. That is to say: the Millennium Group has become a fictional standin for another mostly fictional group, the Illuminati, or any such organization.<\/p>\n<p>Given we have Terry O&#8217;Quinn here, I&#8217;d love for there to be a Rimbaldi tie-in, though I know there isn&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>2. Over in &#8216;The X-Files&#8217; our homicidal friend &#8216;the Pusher&#8217; is back, this time breaking himself out of prison and engaging with his fraternal twin sister in a kind of &#8216;fox hunt&#8217; (see: the episode title). By the end Modine is dead, as is his sister, and so that is all wrapped up. It&#8217;s a decent monster-of-the-week that explores Mulder&#8217;s psychology a little, and it works as a television episode, but there&#8217;s very little Mulder-Scully specific in it; in fact, their relationship is strained at best here (and it&#8217;s not as if the plot of the episode serves to explore and then repair their relationship) &#8230; they share screen time but there is no banter, no interaction. This could have been an episode of some other show.<\/p>\n<p>3. During dinner we watched &#8220;Toy Story 2&#8221;, which I&#8217;d not seen in some years (since Berlin?). Last week or so we rewatched the first. At the risk of getting myself in a little trouble, I must note the following: Ms. S. always told me that she hates animated films \/ cartoons. Such a silly thing for an adult to watch, she notes. They&#8217;re just for kids. She did not fall in love with &#8220;The Incredibles&#8221; when we watched that a year or more ago. And yet then there was &#8220;Wreck-It Ralph&#8221;, during which she smiled, and then &#8220;Bolt!&#8221; And then she suggested &#8220;Toy Story&#8221;, I believe, and even the sequel.<\/p>\n<p><em>Something is amiss!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>4. Several new-ish television shows have failed to really capture our attention, and other things we love do not currently have new episodes available. We tried &#8216;The Following&#8217; and it started dire and became more so. I could not work up enough energy to care about &#8216;Cult&#8217; past the second episode, which went nowhere after the first, which was clever but not as clever as it wanted to be. It was a meta show about fandom and the internet, but understood neither. &#8216;The Americans&#8217; holds great promise; we watched the pilot together, and I then watched the second episode. It has received good reviews, and so I think I&#8217;ll get us into watching it at a later date, perhaps once most of the episodes have aired. At some point we&#8217;ll just sit down and watch all of the second season of &#8216;American Horror Story&#8217; at once &#8230; because that&#8217;s what it demands. Things we enjoyed or at least tried last year (&#8216;Revenge&#8217; and &#8216;Once Upon A Time&#8217;, respectively) haven&#8217;t really held our attention.<\/p>\n<p>This is just a prelude to saying that when we have time left on the clock and want to watch something, we&#8217;ve recently started up episodes of &#8216;Ripper Street&#8217;. It&#8217;s expertly crafted and its production values are good. It&#8217;s well cast, I think, and they&#8217;ve laid the groundwork for plenty of character elaborations. But also as the A.V. Club noted, it&#8217;s a perfectly fine procedural, if that&#8217;s what you want; but it doesn&#8217;t really stand out as spectacular or game-changing. Its concept is simply: police procedural in late-Victorian London.<\/p>\n<p>What makes it work for me is that tangentially works as a kind of cultural history of the place and era. It&#8217;s smart but not exactly witty; it does not strive to be more than mere entertainment and it&#8217;s not &#8216;bad&#8217; enough to go off the rails. While I enjoy how the plots give us history&#8217;s first snuff film (in a sense) and all that good stuff, I really do wish in a way for more of something in the mold of &#8220;From Hell&#8221;, something even more esoteric and ambitious.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s really quite good.<\/p>\n<p>But is it something that I&#8217;ll rewatch? Unlikely.<\/p>\n<p>It stormed around 6am, plus or minus. It did it again around 8 or 8:30pm, and it was a certain kind of glorious.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And it rained today. And rained and rained. We got in some quality tv-together-time (T3).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[476,192,502,345],"class_list":["post-751","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-various-and-sundry","tag-millennium","tag-movies-2","tag-pixar","tag-the-x-files"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/751","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=751"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/751\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.universalem.org\/homo_aestheticus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}